MBA考试
报考指南考试报名准考证打印成绩查询考试题库

重置密码成功

请谨慎保管和记忆你的密码,以免泄露和丢失

注册成功

请谨慎保管和记忆你的密码,以免泄露和丢失

首页MBA考试题库正文
  • 阅读理解A
    题干:Publicdistrustofscientistsstemsinpartfromtheblurringofboundariesbetweenscienceandtechnology,betweendiscoveryandmanufacture.Mostgovernment,perhapsallgovernments,justifypublicexpenditureonscientificresearchintermsoftheeconomicbenefitsthescientificenterprisehavebroughtinthepastandwillbringinthefuture.Politiciansremindtheirvotersofthesplendidmachines“ourscientists”haveinvented,thenewdrugstorelieveoldailments(病痛),andthenewsurgicalequipmentandtechniquesbywhichpreviouslyintractable(难治疗的)conditionsmaynowbetreatedandlivessaved.Atthesametime,thepoliticiansdemandofscientiststhattheytailortheirresearchto“economicsneeds”,thattheyawardahigherprioritytoresearchproposalsthatare“nearthemarket”andcanbetranslatedintothegreatestreturnoninvestmentintheshortesttime.Dependent,astheyare,onpoliticiansformuchoftheirfunding,scientistshavelittlechoicebuttocomply.Liketherestofus,theyaremembersofasocietythatratesthecreationofwealthasthegreatestpossiblegood.Manyhavereservations,butkeepthemtothemselvesinwhattheyperceiveasaclimatehostiletothepursuitofunderstandingforitsownsakeandtheideaofaninquiring,creativespirit.Insuchcircumstancesnooneshouldbetoohardonpeoplewhoaresuspiciousofconflictsofinterest.Whenwelearnthatthedistinguishedprofessorassuringusofthesafetyofaparticularproductholdsaconsultancywiththecompanymakingit,wecannotbeblamedforwonderingwhetherhisfeemightconceivablycloudhisprofessionaljudgment.Eveniftheprofessorholdsnoconsultancywithanyfirm,somepeoplemanystilldistrusthimbecauseofhisassociationwiththosewhodo,oratleastwonderaboutthesourceofsomehisresearchfunding.Thisattitudecanhavedamagingeffects.Itquestionstheintegrityofindividualsworkinginaprofessionthatprizesintellectualhonestyasthesupremevirtue,andplaysintothehandsofthosewhowouldliketodiscreditscientistsbyrepresentingthemavenal(可以收买的).Thismakesiteasiertodismissallscientificpronouncements,butespeciallythosemadebythescientistswhopresentthemselvesas“experts”.Thescientistmostlikelytounderstandthesafetyofanuclearreactor,forexample,isanuclearengineerdeclaresthatareactorisunsafe,webelievehim,becauseclearlyitisnottohisadvantagetolieaboutit.Ifhetellsusitissafe,ontheotherhand,wedistrusthim,becausehemaywellbeprotectingtheemployerwhopayshissalary.
    题目:According to the author, people are suspicious of the professional judgment of scientistsbecause_____.
  • A 、their pronouncements often turn out to be wrong
  • B 、sometimes they hide the source of their research funding
  • C 、some of them do not give priority to intellectual honesty
  • D 、they could be influenced by their association with the project concerned

扫码下载亿题库

精准题库快速提分

参考答案

【正确答案:D】

例证题。本题看起来是因果推断题,问的是人们怀疑科学家的专业判断的原因是什么,但是文章中第二段是通过一个实例来阐明的,所以这是一道隐蔽的例证题。第二段举的例子说的是一知名科学家为一产品做质保,而他同时又在制造这个产品的公司担任顾问一职,也就是说他本身就与这个公司有牵扯(association with the company),所以人们自然就会质疑其专业判断。故选D选项。

您可能感兴趣的试题
热门试题换一换

亿题库—让考试变得更简单

已有600万用户下载