普通研究生入学
报考指南考试报名准考证打印成绩查询考试题库

重置密码成功

请谨慎保管和记忆你的密码,以免泄露和丢失

注册成功

请谨慎保管和记忆你的密码,以免泄露和丢失

当前位置: 首页普通研究生入学考试英语模拟试题正文
专项练习:2021年考研英语基础模拟题(六十)
帮考网校2020-10-31 10:50
专项练习:2021年考研英语基础模拟题(六十)

2021年考研初试备考还有最后的近两个月时间,相信大家也都在紧张的复习当中。在复习时,多做练习题可以让我们更加了解考试内容。下面,帮考网为大家带来考研初试的一些模拟试题,正在备考的小伙伴赶紧练起来吧。

Text 2

Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.

California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumptions that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.

The court would be recklessly modest if it followed Californias advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justices can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.

They should start by discarding Californias lame argument that exploring the contents of a smart phonea vast storehouse of digital informationis similar to, say, rifling through a suspects purse. The court has ruled that police dont violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring ones smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestees reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of cloud computing, meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.

Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitutions prohibition on unreasonable searches.

As so often is the case, stating that principle doesnt ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly onerous for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while a warrant is pending. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.

But the justices should not swallow Californias argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitutions protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.

26. The Supreme Court will work out whether, during an arrest, it is legitimate to_______.

[A] prevent suspects from deleting their phone contents

[B] search for suspects mobile phones without a warrant

[C] check suspects phone contents without being authorized

[D]prohibit suspects from using their mobile phones

27. The authors attitude toward Californias argument is one of_______.

[A] disapproval

[B] indifference

[C] tolerance

[D]cautiousness

28. The author believes that exploring ones phone contents is comparable to_______.

[A] getting into ones residence

[B] handling ones historical records

[C] scanning ones correspondences

[D] going through ones wallet

29. In Paragraphs 5 and 6, the author shows his concern that_______.

[A] principles are hard to be clearly expressed

[B] the court is giving police less room for action

[C] citizens privacy is not effectively protected

[D] phones are used to store sensitive information

30. Orin Kerrs comparison is quoted to indicate that_______.

[A] the Constitution should be implemented flexibly

[B] new technology requires reinterpretation of the Constitution

[C]Californias argument violates principles of the Constitution

[D]principles of the Constitution should never be altered

参考答案:C 26. C 27. A 28. A 29. C 30. B

以上就是帮考网为大家带来的全部内容,希望能给大家一些帮助。帮考网提醒:目前2021年考研大纲已经公布,小伙伴们在复习时要注意以大纲为准哦。另外,小伙伴们如果还有其他关于考研信息的疑问,也可以留言咨询哦。

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:service@bkw.cn 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
考研百宝箱离考试时间626天
学习资料免费领取
免费领取全套备考资料
测一测是否符合报考条件
免费测试,不要错过机会
提交
互动交流

微信扫码关注公众号

获取更多考试热门资料

温馨提示

信息提交成功,稍后帮考专业顾问免费为您解答,请保持电话畅通!

我知道了~!
温馨提示

信息提交成功,稍后帮考专业顾问给您发送资料,请保持电话畅通!

我知道了~!

提示

信息提交成功,稍后班主任联系您发送资料,请保持电话畅通!