在职研究生入学
报考指南考试报名准考证打印成绩查询考试题库

重置密码成功

请谨慎保管和记忆你的密码,以免泄露和丢失

注册成功

请谨慎保管和记忆你的密码,以免泄露和丢失

当前位置: 首页在职研究生入学考试英语历年真题正文
真题练习,2020年考研英语一阅读理解(3)
帮考网校2020-09-09 11:55
真题练习,2020年考研英语一阅读理解(3)

在职研究生入学考试中,英语考试部分很重要,考生要多加强此方面的练习。以下是为大家分享的2020年考研英语一阅读理解练习(答案完整版),大家可作为参考练习。一起和帮考网来看看吧!

第三篇:

Progressives often support diversity mandates as a path to equality and a way to level the playing field. But all too often such policies are an insincere form of virtue-signaling that benefits only the most privileged and does little to help average people.

A pair of bills sponsored by Massachusetts state Senator Jason Lewis and House Speaker Pro Tempore Patricia Haddad, to ensure "gender parity" on boards and commissions, provide a case in point.

Haddad and Lewis are concerned that more than half the state-government boards are less than 40 percent female. In order to ensure that elite women have more such opportunities, they have proposed imposing government quotas. If the bills become law, state boards and commissions will be required to set aside 50 percent of board seats for women by 2022.

The bills are similar to a measure recently adopted in California, which last year became the first state to require gender quotas for private companies. In signing the measure, California Governor Jerry Brown admitted that the law, which expressly classifies people on the basis of sex, is probably unconstitutional.

The US Supreme Court frowns on sex-based classifications unless they are designed to address an "important" policy interest, because the California law applies to all boards, even where there is no history of prior discrimination, courts are likely to rule that the law violates the constitutional guarantee of "equal protection".

But are such government mandates even necessary? Female participation on corporate boards may not currently mirror the percentage of women in the general population, but so what?

The number of women on corporate boards has been steadily increasing without government interference. According to a study by Catalyst, between 2010 and 2015 the share of women on the boards of global corporations increased by 54 percent.

Requiring companies to make gender the primary qualification for board membership will inevitably lead to less experienced private sector boards. That is exactly what happened when Norway adopted a nationwide corporate gender quota.

Writing in The New Republic, Alice Lee notes that increasing the number of opportunities for board membership without increasing the pool of qualified women to serve on such boards has led to a "gold skirt" phenomenon. Where the same elite women scoop up multiple seats on a variety of boards.

Next time somebody pushes corporate quotas as a way to promote gender equity, remember that such policies are largely self-serving measures that make their sponsors feel good but do little to help average women.

31. 【题干】The author believes hat the bills sponsored by Lewis and Haddad will _____.

【选项】

A.help little to reduce gender bias.

B.pose a threat to the state government.

C.raise women\'s position in politics.

D.greatly broaden career options.

【答案】A

32. 【题干】Which of the following is true of the California measure? _____

【选项】

A.It has irritated private business owners.

B.It is welcomed by the Supreme Court.

C.It may go against the Constitution.

D.It will settle the prior controversies.

【答案】C

33.【题干】 The author mentions the study by Catalyst to illustrate _____.

【选项】

A.the harm from arbitrary board decision.

B.the importance of constitutional guarantees.

C.the pressure on women in global corporations.

D.the needlessness of government interventions.

【答案】D

34. 【题干】Norway\'s adoption of a nationwide corporate gender quota has led to _____.

【选项】

A.the underestimation of elite women\'s role.

B.the objection to female participation on bards.

C.the entry of unqualified candidates into the board.

D.the growing tension between Labor and management.

【答案】C

35. 【题干】Which of the following can be inferred from the text? _____

【选项】

A.Women\'s need in employment should be considered.

B.Feasibility should be a prime concern in policymaking.

C.Everyone should try hard to promote social justice.

D.Major social issues should be the focus of legislation.

【答案】B

以上就是本次帮考网和大家分享的全部内容了,希望小伙伴们能够继续努力,相信最后一定会取得好成绩的。关注帮考网,还有更多有关考试练习在等着你哦!

声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献自行上传,本网站不拥有所有权,未作人工编辑处理,也不承担相关法律责任。如果您发现有涉嫌版权的内容,欢迎发送邮件至:service@bkw.cn 进行举报,并提供相关证据,工作人员会在5个工作日内联系你,一经查实,本站将立刻删除涉嫌侵权内容。
在职考研百宝箱离考试时间622天
学习资料免费领取
免费领取全套备考资料
测一测是否符合报考条件
免费测试,不要错过机会
提交
互动交流

微信扫码关注公众号

获取更多考试热门资料

温馨提示

信息提交成功,稍后帮考专业顾问免费为您解答,请保持电话畅通!

我知道了~!
温馨提示

信息提交成功,稍后帮考专业顾问给您发送资料,请保持电话畅通!

我知道了~!

提示

信息提交成功,稍后班主任联系您发送资料,请保持电话畅通!