为了帮助广大考生顺利通过口译笔译考试，帮考网为大家分享了一些口译笔译相关内容，希望大家每天坚持练习，积极备考。

题目：

1、What is the Electoral College? what is its basic function?

2、 Why does the authｏｒpropose to abolish the institution of the Electoral College? What is the majｏｒcause of the American government’s dysfunction?

3、 Why does the authｏｒsuggest replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives? What is the problem with this remedy?

According to the author, what is the “must reasonable” solution to end America’s divided government? What is the practice adopted in Iowa?

读完题目后我们可以遇见出文章内容。文章的关键词是Electoral College。作者提议废除Electoral College。并由此引出美国政府体制的失常。废除Electoral College之后，作者评析了 replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives 的方法。最后作者提出了一个最终的结论。

本文如下。

As the wealthiest nation in history debates whether we\\'re interested in paying our bills, it\\'s time to unmask the true cause of our dysfunction: Neither Republicans nｏｒDemocrats are ultimately to blame. Instead, the problem lies at the antiquated core of the world\\'s oldest, creakiest democracy. More specifically, we must abolish that most heinous of institutions, the Electoral College.

I\\'m not sure I\\'ve ever met anyone with a kind word to say about the College, a seemingly vestigialｇｒｏｕｐthat meets every four years to formally elect the president we all already voted for. Other countries with well-functioning governments have similar mysterious organs in place (call them the tonsils of democracy), but with a crucial difference: We\\'re the only nation on Earth to continue electing an executive president, as opposed to a figurehead, in this fashion.

Why is this such a problem? I present you with Exhibit A: whatever\\'s currently on the front page of today\\'s Tribune. Exhibit B: yesterday\\'s front page; Exhibit C: tomorrow\\'s; etc, etc. The slow-motion brain-flatulence of a government shutdown is a perfect example of the problems inherent to divided government, where two co-equal branches are pitted against one another, run by opposing leaders with no incentive to compromise. This paralysis is an inevitable outcome of a system dominated by two ideologically distinct parties, elected separately to three institutions meant to check ａｎｄ　balance each other.

ａｎｄ　yet, a simple tweak could dramatically decrease the odds of this division reoccurring, without requiring any major changes to our Constitution. Merely replacing the members of the Electoral College with the House of Representatives would ensure that, at least half the time, the president ａｎｄ　the House were in alignment — ａｎｄ　if we reformed the redistricting process to ensure truly democratic congressional elections, our government would function even more smoothly.

In this scenario, every four years, voters would elect congresspeople who would then elect a president, similar to how parliamentary systems choose a prime minister. In those elections, congressional races would function as a proxy fｏｒthe presidential race — as they largely do already. Congressional elections have become nationalized, as most candidates align themselves with their party\\'s presidential nominee ａｎｄ　run on national issues like the budget, gun control ａｎｄ　health care, so this would be no great change.

There would still be a chance fｏｒgridlock, of course — for one thing, the Senate is left entirely out of this equation. In off-year elections, it\\'s possible that the president\\'s party would lose a majority in the House, ensuring the same divided government we have today. But such division would be guaranteed to end after two years, a fact that would dramatically ａｌｔｅｒthe incentives fｏｒcongressional leaders.

It\\'s certainly true that this alone isn\\'t a very dramatic reform, ａｎｄ　that as long as we\\'re talking about constitutional amendments, why not go all-out ａｎｄ　adopt a parliamentary system like most well-functioning Western governments? That might be a great idea, ａｎｄ　political scientists — from the late Yale political science scholar Juan Linz, to Slate magazine\\'s Matt Yglesias — have long noted that presidential systems have a pretty terrible track record, with America being the sole exception to an otherwise unbroken string of failure. But it just doesn\\'t seem politically possible to attempt such a wholesale revamp of our governance structure, particularly since the mere ratification of a constitutional amendment hasn\\'t happened in 21 years.

看到这里小伙伴们是否有所收获呢？希望帮考网为大家分享的内容能给大家带来帮助，后续也可以多关注帮考网，这里有更多的考试资讯，你想知道的都在这！