小伙伴们，雅思考试大家复习的怎么样了呢？下面是帮考网分享的一些雅思考试作文部分的资料，一起来看看吧！

Some governments say how many children a family can hare in their country. They may control the number of children someone has through taxes. It is sometimes necessary and right for a government to control the population in this way.

Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer.

Model Answer:

It is certainly very understandable that some governments should start looking at ways of limiting their populations to a sustainable figure. In the past, populations were partly regulated by frequent war and widespread disease, but in recent years the effects of those factors have been diminished. Countries can be faced with a population that is growing much faster than she nation\'s food resources or employment opportunities and whose members can be condemned to poverty by the need to feed extra mouths. They identify population control as a means to raising living standards.

But how should it be achieved? Clearly, this whole area is a very delicate personal and cultural issue. Many people feel that this is not a matter for the state. They feel this is one area of life where they have the right to make decisions for themselves. For that reason, it would seem that the best. Approach would be to work by persuasion rather than compulsion This could be done by a process of education that points out the way a smaller family can mean an improved quality of life for the family members, as well as less strain on the country\'s perhaps very limited, resources.

This is the preferred way. Of course if this docs not succeed within a reasonable time scale, it may be necessary to consider other measures. Such as tax incentives or child-benefit payments for small families only. These are midway between persuasion and compulsion.

So. Yes. It is sometimes necessary, but governments should try very hard to persuade first. They should also remember that this is a very delicate area indeed, and that social engineering can create as many problems as it solves?

附：雅思写作用语有什么技巧?

具象词用作抽象词：

具体词用作抽象词是指把一个单词的具体含义进行引申从而用在某些抽象的场合。我们一起来看下面几个例子。

e.g.: The soccer fans basked in the glory of world cup</p><p>

bask这个单词表示晒太阳，由此可以引申出沉浸，沐浴在(胜利，喜悦，赞美，关怀中)。所以这句话的意思是球迷们沉浸在世界杯的荣耀中。

e.g.: Social mobility, or the lack of it, gnaws at the consciences of governments.<p>

gnaw原义是指小动物(啮齿类动物) 咬，啃。引申一下就变成了使烦恼、折磨。这句话是说社会流动性或缺乏社会流动性折磨着政府的良心。

finance的本义大家都很熟悉，表示“财政，资金”，引申义是“为...提供资金”。这种用法在经济类期刊杂志中很常见。

e.g.: The fund has been used mainly to finance the construction of local facilities.

throw原本指人在马背上，被马突然摔在地上。因此就有了这样的用法，表示使处于、使陷入(某种状态中)。这句话的意思是战争使成千上万人无家可归。

e.g.: Thousands were thrown into homeless by the war.

好了，以上就是今天分享的全部内容了，各位小伙伴根据自己的情况进行查阅，希望本文对各位有所帮助，预祝各位取得满意的成绩，如需了解更多相关内容，请关注帮考网！